Published
Assessment of adult structural plasticity in Drosophila neurons
María Fernanda Ceriani, Micaela Rodriguez-Caron, Francisco Joaquin Tassara, Juan Ignacio Ispizua, Christian Mauricio Carpio-Romero
doi:10.1098/rsob.260120Abstract
Unravelling how adult neurons reshape their architecture is key to understanding post-developmental plasticity. Drosophila clock neurons, which remodel their terminals on a daily basis, offer a unique model to examine the mechanisms underlying structural plasticity. In this study, we examine the impact of the experimental design on the remodelling process. We established a simple fixation protocol that preserves tissue integrity and prevents its deformation while enabling the fixation of a larger number of individuals within the appropriate time window. We show that intrinsic (i.e. targeting fluorescent reporters to the membrane) or extrinsic (i.e. temperature) variables may influence this dynamic process. Examining ex vivo preparations, we found that the small lateral ventral neuron (s-LNv) terminals display numerous thin filopodia extending from their synaptic boutons. However, these fine membrane protrusions are lost upon fixation, as they could only be accurately visualized ex vivo. Finally, we present MorphoScope , a Pythonbased interface that eliminates observer bias in complexity measurements. Altogether, we present a powerful and robust model to investigate the principles of adult neuronal plasticity, with implications extending beyond circadian biology.
This paper is a public record. Anyone with a DKG node can fetch it and check who submitted it: the panel shows how.
- Read
- Saved off-chain
- Minted on-chain
- Published
Verify it yourself
These values are public. You can check each one without trusting us.
The signature matches the submitter
The submission
- Submitter's signature
0xf0681501ab06…d5c9e81b- Signed deadline (Unix seconds)
1794146881- Context graph
0xd701ed157232ad5e14bc…ain-prod
The asset
- Knowledge Asset (UAL)
did:dkg:base:84532/0xd…f13b3/52
How to check this record
- Subscribe a DKG node to the context graph above and fetch the asset by its UAL: a UAL alone does not name its graph. The node returns the title, authors, PDF link, submitter, signature and deadline.
- Check the signature. It's EIP-712 typed data with the domain
{ name: "labstrail", version: "1", chainId: 84532 }and the typeSubmission(string cid,string contextGraph,uint256 deadline). A paper published before LabsTrail was renamed is signed with the name"verisci"instead. Any EIP-712 library recovers the signer to compare with the submitter; a smart-contract wallet is checked on chain with ERC-1271. - Download the PDF by its CID. An IPFS client checks every block against its hash, so a changed file can't come back under this CID. To recompute the CID from a local copy, use Pinata's v1 import settings: CIDv1, raw leaves, 256 KiB chunks.
- Open the asset token on Basescan. It's an ERC-721 token in OriginTrail's DKGKnowledgeAssets contract, minted to LabsTrail's node, and its page shows when. The merkle root of the asset's statements is anchored with it, so any node can check that the content still matches.
Ratings
Reproducibility readiness
How completely the paper reports what others need to repeat its work, from 0 to 100, checked against the reporting checklist for each kind of study in it. It doesn't say whether the findings are right.
Not rated yet
An AI model checks the paper against the checklists for the kinds of study it reports, quoting the paper for each answer, and the score is recorded on chain. It usually takes a few minutes.
Free on testnet: you pay only gas. A wallet can have 3 ratings waiting at a time.
- Reproducibility readinesslive
- Human reviewnext
- Wet-lab replicationlater