Skip to content
LabsTrail

Published

Initiators counteract Polycomb repression and stimulate long-range contacts between enhancers and the Abdominal-B promoter in Drosophila

Olga Kyrchanova, Ksenia Kudryashova, Vasilisa Dubrovskaya, Airat Ibragimov, Paul Schedl, Pavel Georgiev

doi:10.1098/rsob.250192

Abstract

The specification of abdominal segments A5 to A9 depends on the expression of Abdominal-B (Abd-B), which is regulated by four infraabdominal domains: iab-5 through iab-8,9. Each iab domain contains an initiation element that determines its active state, along with enhancers responsible for tissue-specific activation of Abd-B. These iab domains function autonomously due to their flanking boundaries, Fab-6, Fab-7 and Fab-8, which both block crosstalk between adjacent iab domains (insulator function) and facilitate long-range interactions with the Abd-B promoter (bypass function). In inactive iab domains, enhancers are repressed by Polycomb group (PcG) proteins. Activation of the iab domains is driven by initiators, which are stimulated in a segment-specific manner by products of the gap and pair-rule genes during early embryogenesis. By creating truncations of the Fab-6 boundary, we identified that the bypass module is adjacent to CTCF binding sites and overlaps with sequences responsible for recruiting PcG proteins. Using genome editing, we demonstrated that the iab-5 and iab-6 initiators enhance the activity of the Fab-6 bypass module. Therefore, initiators represent a novel class of regulatory elements that control long-distance interactions between iab enhancers and Abd-B promoters.

This paper is a public record. Anyone with a DKG node can fetch it and check who submitted it: the panel shows how.

  1. Read
  2. Saved off-chain
  3. Minted on-chain
  4. Published

Verify it yourself

These values are public. You can check each one without trusting us.

The signature matches the submitter

The submission

Submitted by
0x9a17ec95e96f…c7bf9111
Submitter's signature
0x0edd431af667…d4e97a1b
Signed deadline (Unix seconds)
1792403137
Context graph
0xd701ed157232ad5e14bc…ain-prod

The asset

Minted to LabsTrail's node
0xd701ed157232…d86f13b3
Asset token (ERC-721, OriginTrail's DKGKnowledgeAssets)
97250665584536…42449953
Knowledge Asset (UAL)
did:dkg:base:84532/0xd…f13b3/33
PDF (CID)
bafybeidtdi3op…urx4o44u
How to check this record
  1. Subscribe a DKG node to the context graph above and fetch the asset by its UAL: a UAL alone does not name its graph. The node returns the title, authors, PDF link, submitter, signature and deadline.
  2. Check the signature. It's EIP-712 typed data with the domain { name: "labstrail", version: "1", chainId: 84532 } and the type Submission(string cid,string contextGraph,uint256 deadline). A paper published before LabsTrail was renamed is signed with the name "verisci" instead. Any EIP-712 library recovers the signer to compare with the submitter; a smart-contract wallet is checked on chain with ERC-1271.
  3. Download the PDF by its CID. An IPFS client checks every block against its hash, so a changed file can't come back under this CID. To recompute the CID from a local copy, use Pinata's v1 import settings: CIDv1, raw leaves, 256 KiB chunks.
  4. Open the asset token on Basescan. It's an ERC-721 token in OriginTrail's DKGKnowledgeAssets contract, minted to LabsTrail's node, and its page shows when. The merkle root of the asset's statements is anchored with it, so any node can check that the content still matches.

Ratings

Reproducibility readiness

How completely the paper reports what others need to repeat its work, from 0 to 100, checked against the reporting checklist for each kind of study in it. It doesn't say whether the findings are right.

Not rated yet

An AI model checks the paper against the checklists for the kinds of study it reports, quoting the paper for each answer, and the score is recorded on chain. It usually takes a few minutes.

Free on testnet: you pay only gas. A wallet can have 3 ratings waiting at a time.

  1. Reproducibility readinesslive
  2. Human reviewnext
  3. Wet-lab replicationlater